Members
Email:
Password:
Forgotten password
 Nano Risk Reviews - the SAFENANO list
 
Since the 2004 publication of the Royal Society and the Royal Academy of Engineering Report Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties,  more than 25 national and international reviews have been carried out by government departments, industry associations, insurance organizations and researchers which have considered nanoparticle risk issues as a major theme. These reviews have provided a consistent view about the nature and the potential risks of nanoparticles, which may be summarised as follows:

  • There are potential risks to health and the environment from the manufacture and use of nanoparticles
  • There is a lack of knowledge about what these risks are and how to deal with them
  • The lack of data makes it difficult for manufacturers, suppliers and users to have effective risk management processes and to comply with their regulatory duties


All of the stakeholders (regulators, companies) need to start to address these risks now

Here is the SAFENANO list of the 25 or so which in our view are highly relevant. While this is certainly not a comprehensive list, we think that it does contain most of the main opinion-forming pieces written over the last few years. We will continue to add to this as new publications emerge.
Let us know if you think significant publications are missing.

 

 

 

 

 

5. Borm, P.J.A., Robbins, D., Haubold, S., Kuhlbusch, T., Fissan, H., Donaldson, K., Schins, R.P.F., Stone, V., Kreyling, W., Lademann, J., "Krutmann, J., Warheit, D.B. & Oberdorster, E. 2006, "The potential risks of nanomaterials: a review carried out for ECETOC", Particle and Fibre Toxicology, vol. 3, no. 11.

6. Christiansen, K. 2004, Background Paper on Environmental and Risk Aspects of Nanotechnology. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Copenhagen.