Nanotechnology: 'Risk Governance' in India

Search SAFENANO

Search:

SAFENANO Tags

applications best practice business carbon nanotubes case study characterisation commercial products conference consumer products & protection consumers cosmetics dermal disease ecotoxicology emerging risks enpra environment european commission exposure assessment exposure limits feature article food good practice guidance hazard assessment health and safety human health industry legislation life cycle manufacture manufacturing safety measurement NIOSH OECD personal protective equipment policy REACH reference materials regulation research risk assessment & management society standards titanium dioxide toxicity toxicology training workplace

You are here > Knowledge Base > Current Awareness > Article View

SAFENANO News

Nanotechnology: 'Risk Governance' in India
Created by assoceditor on 06/02/2012 16:16:11

A new report in Economic & Political Weekly analyses the potential consequences of the application of nanotechnology in India.

A new report in Economic & Political Weekly [pdf] analyses the potential consequences of the application of nanotechnology in India, while specifically looking at the risk-related aspects of this emerging technology. The authors address the following questions:

What are the risks that nanotechnology may pose?
What does the Indian situation look like?
How can the risks of nanotechnology be adequately dealt with?
How can we avoid the, at times, unproductive controversies that have surrounded some of the mega-technologies in the past in order to cast a more fruitful and productive path for nanotechnology’s future?

The article explores the institutional arrangements for "risk governance" of nanotechnology in other countries, in an effort to illustrate possible ways for risk governance to be made operational. The authors, Jayanthi et al., note that while more technologically advanced countries tend to accompany technology developments with governance arrangements that ensure the responsible development of such technologies, in India attention to risks is minimal.

Jayanthi et al. write: "Rather than explicitly taking broader societal concerns into consideration when promoting the development of a technology, it seems that any kind of measure to deal with potential adverse effects of new technologies is considered as inimical to market investment in technology sectors. By and large, the Indian state has shown a lack of anticipatory governance during the course of technology development."

The report concludes that the regulatory framework in India at present is not able to deal with the multifaceted dimensions and implications of nanotechnology. An effective risk governance system is urgently required, they say, arguing that a separate agency, similar to the one established for biotechnology, be implemented in order to develop human resources and infrastructure, as well as research and monitor issues and concerns in the field.

"Only by creating such a well-functioning governance structure," the authors conclude, "can India make nanotechnology into a success."

Click here to read the report in full.

Source: Meridian Nanotechnology & Development News

Comments

	Knowledge Base	Services	Research
Sign up for our newsletter	Current Awareness	Solutions	Our skills
Sign up for our newsletter	Guidance	Expertise	Projects Undertaken
	Regulation	Importance of Nanosafety	Collaborate with Us
Send us your questions	Standards	Nanosafety Test
Send us your questions	Resources	Downloads		Add & Share \|